PSS, Inc. Logo
 droplet
 arrow
 droplet
 arrow
 droplet
 arrow
 droplet
 arrow
droplet
 arrow


arrow
arrow
arrow
PHASE FACTS

Links to Related Sites

Compound Lists

Phase Facts:
Speciation of Metals: Chromium bullet
New Approach to Soil Handling for Volatiles bullet
Sampling Volatiles In Soil by 5035 bullet
MTBE - The Next Challenge bullet
Utilizing TPH Methods Effectively bullet
TPH Method Overlap bullet
Specific Petroleum Compound Testing bullet
TPH 1664 vs. 413.1 and 418.1 bullet
TCLP vs. SPLP Extraction Procedures
bullet
Analyzing for Metals by ICP/MS bullet
ICP/MS Qualitative All Elements Scan bullet
Is The TCLP 1311 Extraction The Correct Method For Your Project ?

What About SPLP 1312?

TCLP extractions are often misapplied. TCLP is the acronym for Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure. This methodology was developed to estimate the mobility of specific inorganic and organic contaminates that are destined for disposal in municipal landfills.

The TCLP extraction is performed by subjecting the material in question to a simulated landfill leachate. Acetic acid was chosen as the extraction fluid because it is the major component of typical municipal landfill leachates. The pH of the acetic acid buffer solution is maintained at 4.93. This sample/acetic acid mixture is subjected to an 18 (( 2 hour) rotary extraction, designed to accelerate years of material/landfill exposure in the shortest possible time. After extraction, the resulting liquid is subjected to analysis utilizing a list of 39 contaminants that are contained in the EPA’s TCLP Final Rule. These contaminants include eight metals, eleven volatile organic compounds, twelve semi-volatile organic compounds, six pesticides, and two herbicides.

Consequently, the TCLP test should be limited to determining if a waste should be considered a RCRA-regulated waste or, if it can be disposed of in a municipal (sanitary) landfill.

The TCLP procedure may be misapplied in two ways. First, analysis of compounds not included in the methods development or TCLP Final Rule may provide technically invalid results. An example of this would be the utilization of the TCLP extraction for cyanide. The extraction procedure itself will result in the loss of simple cyanide complexes, representing the most toxic form of cyanide.

The second way the TCLP is misapplied is by use of the procedure for materials that are not destined for landfills where interaction with acetic acid is likely. In these cases an alternative procedure, the SPLP, (Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure) EPA SW-846 Method 1312 may be appropriate. This procedure is applicable for materials where the leaching potential due to normal rainfall is to be determined. Instead of the landfill leachate simulating acetic acid mixture, nitric and sulfuric acids are utilized in an effort to simulate the acid rains resulting from airborne nitric and sulfuric oxides.

TCLP/SPLP Comparison Chart

(TCLP vs SPLP)

The SPLP procedure is useful in those situations where a determination must be made if a potentially contaminated material, left in situ, will leach toxic substances when exposed to normal weathering. PSS has experience in performing this procedure. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information.

 

PHASE HOMEPAGE
PHASE PROFILE - UTILIZING PHASE - PHASE DOCUMENTS - TECHNICAL UPDATES - CONTACT PHASE

arrows
- LINKS TO RELATED SITES - COMPOUND LISTS -

- PHASE FACTS -
bulletSpeciation Of Metals: ChromiumbulletSampling Volatiles In Soil by 5035 bulletMTBE - The Next Challenge bulletUtilizing TPH Methods Effectively bulletTPH Method Overlap bulletSpecific Petroleum Compound Testing bulletTPH 1664 vs. 413.1 and 418.1 bulletTCLP vs. SPLP Extraction Procedures bulletAnalyzing for Metals by ICP/MS bulletICP/MS Qualitative All Elements Scan

This site created and hosted by e.magination network, LLC